Turn Indigenous impact reporting into compliance‑grade disclosure — without chasing vendors.
As a project owner, you carry the accountability for Indigenous outcomes across an entire supply chain. But fragmented vendor submissions create inconsistent definitions, unverifiable claims, privacy exposure, and leadership-level risk. Pehta standardizes vendor reporting under the Pehta Framework and produces a single, audit‑ready Pehta Project Statement you can stand behind.
Fragmented reporting creates compliance risk. Standardized disclosure removes it.
Typical reality today:
inconsistent formats and definitions across vendors
manual follow‑ups and slow reporting cycles
identity and privacy risk from ad hoc data handling
low confidence for leadership, rights‑holders, and institutional stakeholders
With Pehta:
one standardized submission method across all participants
validation and reconciliation before aggregation
disclosure aligned to the Pehta Framework for comparability
one Aggregated Pehta Project Statement produced with audit trails and disclosed controls
A fully integrated pipeline—submission → analysis → one auditable report
Standardized vendor intake — one secure link per participant
Automated validation & reconciliation — fix issues at the source
Audit‑ready statement — consistent, comparable, exportable evidence
How it Works
Embed Pehta in procurement documents — require standardized submissions across participants.
Guided submission — vendors submit using controlled formats aligned to the Framework.
Validation & reconciliation — logic checks, deduplication, and exception handling occur before roll‑up.
Governance & privacy controls — role‑based access, controlled observer views, auditable change logs.
Aggregated Project Statement — exportable, audit‑ready disclosure for the full supply chain.
Built for governance moments:
Owner and client reporting: disclosure you can deliver without rework or reinterpretation.
Rights‑holder engagement: community‑anchored outcomes that preserve attribution.
IBA and compliance updates: one source of truth across vendors and time.
Investor and institutional review: comparable disclosures with controls and evidentiary differentiation.
What’s inside the Aggregated Project Statement
Employment outcomes (standardized Indigenous hiring metrics)
Procurement outcomes (spend with Indigenous‑owned suppliers)
Community benefits (aligned with rights‑holder guidance)
Methodology & controls (definitions, validation, versioning)
Credibility you can stand behind
SOC 2 Type I controls (via underlying platform)
OCAP®‑aligned data governance approach
Role‑based access and controlled observer views
Full audit trail and versioned methodology
Operational outcomes teams expect
faster vendor completion through standardization
fewer reporting cycles lost to cleanup and rework
consistent definitions across projects and periods
materially higher confidence at leadership and rights‑holder tables